Monthly Archives: February 2018

Gun Control? Only in Wakanda Brother

I am sitting at home watching the Olympic biathlon with my daughter. We are both still trying to figure out why cross county skiing and sniper shooting go together. It’s not as if most people can practice this “sport.” I always thought that the Olympics was about extraordinary people engaging in unbelievable feats of agility, strength and endurance that most of us had engaged in during school, but they were the best and kept it up for world competition.
 
The Biathlon is a remnant of white male gun supremacy, and we should never forget it. It also happened during a week in which we are all still open to the wound of seeing kids be murdered at one of the very institutions designed to keep them the most safe: school. As I am sitting here with my daughter, and we flip away from this obvious time-wasting buffoonery watching men in skis hiking hills and shooting at targets, I see some feminine commercial and rapidly turn away. Then I think to myself that my boys have to be better than me and be more sensitive to women’s products in the future, and I start to drift about how they can’t watch and comment about a woman’s breast exposed during the Superbowl halftime show on TV, or search for girls their own age on the internet out of fear of being placed on charges of child pornography, but they can search for guns all day long…..because as soon as we turned off the Olympics, I saw 2-3 shows with gun violence.
 
I started to drift again: ‘No son, breasts are bad, but bullets are good….’
 
I watched the courageous acts of children combat the cowardice of the president. When the guy tweeted that the children held some responsibility in protecting themselves at school, the children went the hell off on him, and started speaking with cogent analysis, venom laded prose, and staged a series of lie and die ins. And then as much as I loved these children for speaking their truths, exercising their rights, I hated my adult peers for making their actions worth a tinker’s damn. Nothing is going to come from the most recent tragedy, because nothing is better to a white man than a gun. Nothing.
 
You ever touch a gun? You ever load one, shoot one? There is nothing that has that feeling in the world. That cool steel, the smoothness of it, the smell of the powder, that forbidden recoil that kicks back at you, trying to see what you hit and the damage done to it in the process. If you could smoke a gun it would be inhaling a full body orgasm laden with crack, laced with crystal meth, sprinkled with chocolate chips, powdered with cocaine, doused with rum, and smelling like pizza and burritos and hamburgers and bacon and barbecue ribs all at the same time.
 
It is symbolic and physical and phallic and power based and permanent all at the same time. A gun, more than anything else in the world, is leadership. And not everyone has it, and not everyone deserves it. Sméagol wasn’t a fool, he just didn’t have a gun in 3rd earth….
 
In 1640’s Virginia, the first gun control law was enacted in the Americas. Blacks were barred from owning guns—including the freemen.
 
In 1857, during the Dred Scott Case (Supreme Court ruled against Dred Scott’s argument that living in a free state for several years as a slave should have been nullified to allow him to be free, as by definition, a free state should not allow for slavery), Supreme Court Justice Roger Taney stated that blacks could not be citizens, because if they were citizens, they could own guns….
 
After the Civil War, southern states, southern whites and their hate groups went to extraordinary lengths to disarm free blacks, whether it was the use of Black Codes to legalize seizure, or hate groups forcibly removing guns from blacks.
 
At the end of the 19th century, many states had imposed high taxes on guns, or removed cheap guns for purchase, in order to keep blacks and poor whites from purchasing firearms.
 
The NRA also supported California’s Mulford Act of 1967, which had banned carrying loaded weapons in public in response to the Black Panther Party’s impromptu march on the State Capitol to protest gun control legislation on May 2, 1967.
 
Since blacks have always been disarmed, the real issue is not keeping the guns away from America but keeping the guns away from white Americans. Why have blacks always been disarmed? We’ll get to that later…
 
While there is no real statistic to know who own guns, estimates are that about 40% of whites own guns; the 32% of America which is made up of white males make up 61% of gun owners. About 20% of Hispanics and a lesser number of blacks own them today. But there are an estimated 325 million guns in America, despite the estimation that only 1 in 3 households have any. One gun for every American, but only one in three has one—almost the same ratio for whites who owned slaves…..
 
Blacks with guns suffer greater penalty in use; that is a 50 word essay on its own.
 
–Stand your ground in Florida where Marissa Alexander, a black woman shot the gun in the air to scare off an ex-husband while she had a restraining order against him, received a 20 year jail sentence that was later suspended after serving three years– while Floridian George Zimmerman stalked Trayvon Martin, a teenager unknown to him, but yet looked suspicious as he made his way home was approached and later died at the hands of Zimmerman. As the teenager likely fought this stranger for his life, Zimmerman shot and killed him. Not only did he not receive jail time, but an (five white, one Puerto Rican), all female jury acquitted him of all charges, and the majority of white people (over 3 to 2) believed that justice was served.
 
Guns have been the great equalizer for keeping the have nots at bay. The New Republic reported that Forensic scientists excavating sites in Peru have found an Inca man shot through the back of his skull by a conquistador, possibly executed after a 1536 uprising, his body dumped in a mass grave alongside those of women and children. Many of their remains show signs of mutilation and abuse.
 
There is no doubt of the power of the gun on colonization. While the Chinese invented the fire lances, the adaption of Afro-Asian iron and Indo-Chinese gunpowder by Europeans is the most important factor in world domination. There would be no mass colonization if not for the gun. There would be no suppression of insurrection if not for the threat of the gun. There would be no Renaissance, no Industrial Revolution, no American Revolution, if there was no European gun.
 
400 Years after it started colonization, and at its peak after WWI, the British Empire still had influence over 23% of the world’s population and 24% of the world’s land under its territorial rule.
 
There are over 600 separate, distinct cultures that have been taken over by European rule in the last 400 years, and the only way this becomes possible is through the use of the gun.
 
 
The Gun in the Making of the American West
 
Let’s minimize the reality that in a nation that is as large as China, or Canada, there were as many as 100 million people living here in the US before European settlement. There are estimates that 75% of the folk died out before European contact. I am unsure if I believe that mass death statistic, but for my heart, I will accept it. Why? Because if the numbers are not accurate, and those people were here at the onset of European settlement, it makes it all the more frightening how they might have been wiped out.
 
I am going to go with 25 million Native Nation people living in the United States in 1492. How many Native Nation people are here in 2018? According to the 2010 US Census, 5.2 million are at least part native nation (half, is what the number is supposed to represent, not that grandmomma’s grandmomma stuff that most of us with Native ancestry spout off when we parcel out eighths and 64ths and 128ths ). 2.9 million are considered full Native Nation.
 
Why were they killed? Easy: for the western expansion effort. Natives were either opposed to it or fought it, so they got exterminated in war and warfare tactics. War is easy; shoot them down, burn them out. Warfare tactics include things like smallpox sent to natives in blankets or killing their food supplies. Even their food supplies were killed to make way for expansion. In a 30 year span, beginning in the middle of the 19th century, 30 million buffalo/bison were slaughtered. Ironically, this disturbance of the ecosystem not only killed the buffalo, stopped native nations from thriving, but it also contributed to the deforesting of the plains states. And for what? These are for the most part, still the least populated parts of America, and it could be argued that the Native nations could still be living here without much outside interference. Killed off the people, killed off the animals, destroyed the ecosystem, all with the gun, for little return in the end.
 
I estimated once (during one of my independently strange research kicks) that about 2,000 westerns have been made over the last 100 years, and that at least 4,000 shows on episodic TV were made with Westerns in the last 65 years. There are five generations of people here and abroad who have known nothing but the power of the gun to move America westward and to complete the nation. The gun represented the taming of the savage, the reclaiming of the land from the foreigner, and the elimination of the bad guy at the same time. The way that we as Americans see manhood is shaped by the use of a gun. Yet, the imagery of who has the gun is also suspect. If as many as a 1/3 of the American cowboys during the 19th century are black, where are they in cinema? Remove Oscar Michaux movies; I had a hard time finding more than a couple dozen black people in any of these movies or TV shows. What does that do to the psyche of a nation in which a third of the people are literally wiped clean from the historical records, because we don’t want to see them with guns? As for the Mexicans and Native nations, on screen they are usually depicted as the bad guys fighting the white man for his land and his women. We have been force fed a narrative that only serves to give the illusion that white men must keep their guns to stay strong. And name a western woman heroine that didn’t tote a gun ‘as good as any man’…..I’m waiting.
 
Before you think it solely racist, don’t forget about the half million people killed during the Civil War….brothers shooting brothers on purpose, with 2/3 of them doing so for the right to own something that they do not have, little to no land, and no slaves. Anybody going to shoot for the rights of a Raiders season ticket in Las Vegas, even before the stadium is built?
 
Of course they were savages, we are much better today, right? Indeed, what can be said of these earlier settlers that cannot be argued today?
 
  • Politics editor of the Daily Beast, Sam Stein, said that 180 Congressional districts in 2017 (out of 435 folks) have experienced a mass shooting.
 
  • 11 mass school shootings since Columbine, with an average of 10 students dying in each shooting. The overwhelming majority being white and affluent and suburban.
 
  • A high ranking Congressman was shot in the head in front of his Republican Congressional peers on a baseball field. Congresswoman Gabby Giffords was shot; President Reagan was shot; 4 sitting presidents have been shot and killed.
 
If they don’t even take measures to save their own; save themselves, save the institution, why would you think they would work to save you?
 
Nothing is going to change, because guns mean everything.

Black Panther Out

10. Even Pixar wants to feature black people in a cartoon now.  Problem is, being three blocks from Oakland, (and aside from Samuel L. Jackson), they aren’t used to actually talking to black people.

9. The gold diggers in LA are going to have a lot of work to put in; since most will be at the movies and not attending All Star Game weekend.

8. Don’t be surprised when your busted cousin who was kicked out of the BPP Chapter he started in New Rochelle sues Disney for reparations, er, profits to be sent back to the black community.

7. The last time you read a non-pornographic comic was at age 17; if you are a woman—never.  Why are you so hyped on this?  It is still a comic book people.  (Yes, I want to see it too)

6. I’m guessing that the first place a white guy wants to take a black date this week is Black Panther; I’m also guessing that the last place a black guy wants to take a white date this week is Black Panther…

5. It was too late to break up before Valentine’s Day, you should have broken up before pre-sales of Black Panther tickets.

4. There are 646 people credited under Visual Artist.  The only names missing from the list were Uncle Fred and Pookie.

3. Wakanda was based on Baldwin Hills in the 1980’s.

2. Nothing says blackness like an actor named Chadwick.

1b. Stan Lee could walk down the street on MLK and shoot somebody, and still get elected Mayor of Watts or Detroit today.  Stan Lee is going to make so much money and cast so many black people, he could rent out Africa—or Mira Lago—for his cast party.

1a. Conspiracies

–NBC hasn’t supported a black show since Cosby.  NBC is going to experience bad ratings for the Olympics, and they were set up by ABC….

–This is black people’s revenge for Winter Olympics.  Y’all folk better fast track everything before Friday—because this is the pinnacle of Black History Month, and your viewership after Thursday is gonna sink like the President’s ratings.  In 2022, there will be a remake of Coffy and the same thing will happen then.

–You will know it’s been a long time for black people attending theaters when they don’t find “Red” flavor.  The theaters are setting up people for riots when they run out of grape and orange soda.

–The Black Panther…..it’s a cookbook!

–Walt Disney Company=Walt Disney Studios=Marvel Studios=ABC=Blackish=Laurence Fishburne=Morephus=The Matrix.  Walt Disney is putting black people in the Matrix…..

 

Post 2018 Superbowl Musings

10. This is now clearly an offensively minded league, and the stereotypes being made about dirty players or street got replaced with smart and skilled, and class act. As more hits get banned by the league, expect it go up.  Brady played very well tonight, and as long as he can get protection, or never get hit because of the potential penalties, he can play for another five years.

9. I didn’t hear of Brady congratulating the Eagles in the press conference; instead I heard that he didn’t shake the hands of the Eagles in defeat. Gisele Bundchen, his wife, congratulated every Eagles player she saw leaving the stadium.  Brady has played in more Superbowls than any other player in the 52 year history of the game.  Shameful lack of grace…

8. No show on the ground during the first week of February in Minneapolis is an ominous wake up call.

7. Randy Moss played for the Vikings and they got blown out two weeks ago….Moss played for the Patriots and said last year that he would love to come back and play for them again with Brady…coincidence?

6. Who is more upset, Hall of Famer Redskins cornerback Darrell Green for having to give the trophy to the Eagles, or former Eagles coach Chip Kelly?

5. Trump doesn’t get to see his guys at the White House, and he really, really needed that win.

4. Justin Timberlake really is a tool; all of the people that got him to where he is didn’t get the invite to perform with him…no N’Sync, No Timbaland, no Janet Jackson. And his routine looked like any mid part of the program on Sesame Street.

3. There was a concerted effort to try to make us feel something during the ads, but I don’t know what they were trying to make us feel. All I know is, Peter Dinklage did a lip sync to my favorite rap changeup in a song of all time, and Morgan Freeman finished the commercial with his.  All the crappy ads I had to get through in order to see that was WORTH IT!

2. I am taking a less than scientific test, but I bet that zero people at home stood up for the National Anthem, and I didn’t see Trump come after any of them in his tweets like he did tonight for the football players in previous games this season. As usual, I guess it only counts when you’re in front of a TV, and not when you’re a citizen and the world isn’t watching.

1. Philadelphia, America thanks you.

Nunes is Now the Official Minister of Propaganda

Your best friend’s kid is a bully.  Your best friend’s kid is threatening several kids in school, taunting them, frightening them, hazing them, shaking them down for their lunch money, and influencing other kids to beat your kids up when the kids stand up for themselves.  You know your friend spoils this kid, and it is obvious to everyone in your circle that nothing good is going to come from this.  But it is your friend’s child, and you leave it alone—you chalk it up to different parenting styles.  But as this kid gets older, the kid becomes more emboldened and the abusive nature grows.  It causes tensions between you and your friend, and you don’t want your kids around this kid, because the kid is a bad seed, and the maturation of this seed is being directly nourished by someone you valued and thought they would do better.  Your friend is raising this kid on poisoned water, indirect sunlight, and tainted earth.  Bad value system about others who are different, poor reasoning in moral arguments, unhealthy ways to manage disagreement and conflict and what the kid desires.  The kid makes Veruca Salt look like a model child.

So, another friend in your circle has a child in the class with the bully and is a victim of your friend’s kid.  For the longest time, you have tried to stay out of the mess; but now one family is not getting invited to the parties or playdates of the other anymore, and each of your friends are in your ear bad mouthing the other side.  Both sides want your allegiance, and not only are you made to choose sides in the argument, but you are now forced to choose between friendships.

You cannot choose the side of the bully; in fact, you realize that you have contempt for this little kid, and it is affecting how you feel about your friend.  As you distance yourself and your kids from this friend, you now see that the friend is also a bully, and now this friend is forcing a way back in your presence, having a I-won’t-be-ignored-by-you attitude in the conflict.  The bully parent is now attempting to bully you to accept their friendship, yet you are having none of it.

As things heat up at school, many parents are forcing the administration to intervene.  Kids need to feel safe, to be safe at school, and the parents are fed up with the lack of results thus far.  The school’s administration engages in a variety of “safe space” meetings, which enable everyone to be heard.  But the amount and the scope of the arguments from the victims is deafening, and it is clear to you that this is a one-sided abusive relationship.  But the bully and the bully parent, your friend, will not back down.  They now see this as personal attacks on them, and they are at war with everyone.  The bully parent writes a note to the school district law enforcement/administration, stating that it is their side which feels threatened.  The bully parent says that because the kids on the other side are black and brown, and they are white, their child is being targeted for being different, and they believe that the system is out to disadvantage white kids in favor of minorities.  The parent brings in tangential arguments about affirmative action to illustrate their points.  The bully parent then makes assertions that the other kids are colluding together because they in fact hate white people, and all accusations against the bully kid are fake.  The bully parent tells the administration that their family is going to go to the media and report the reverse racism in the school district.  In the complaint, the bully parent makes no argument in favor of disciplining any speficic children or taking any particular course of action; they just want to let other white people know of the reverse discrimination on campus.

But the problem is, nearly all the kids who have been victimized by the bully kid, are white.  You, are white; your friend’s kid in the class with the bully, is white.  The school is overwhelmingly white.  No black kids are even involved.  The school law enforcement asks the bully parent to not go public with this letter, because it would set a bad precedent and inflame the community, particularly when the investigation by the enforcement group isn’t over, and it is pointing to a conclusion that the bully kid is indeed the perpetrator of the offenses.

The bully parent calls the news outlets, releases the letter on social media, and hires an attorney…..

When the FBI questions the accuracy of the Nunes memo and has grave concerns about omissions and points grouped together, that means in plain speak that the FBI believes this memo is a bunch of lies.

The Democrats are mad because:

The Democrats believe this entire process is complete crap.

In years past, when they could not reach a bipartisan perspective, both sides were allowed to put out their versions of the conflict; not anymore.  The Republicans voted down on many occasions the opportunity for Democrats to release the Adam Schiff memo.  Even if the Republicans voted for them to release their version, the President could still say no.

The Republicans are trying to sway public opinion to believe that the system is out to get them.

The Republicans are trying to discredit the FBI investigation.

The Republicans are trying to intimidate the FBI, by letting them know that they are prepared to report them if they don’t like what they see, particularly if it places the President in a bad light.

The Republicans are trying to blow up any government agency that does not fall in line with the President.

This reads like a staff written memo, crafted in a way to make suggestions and strange conclusions without a lot of fact (i.e. the Steele dossier was written to benefit Hillary Clinton, rather than the fact that the document was written for Republicans and ultimately reviewed by the Clinton campaign)

This is a document that is likely written by people in the White House and given to Nunes to present to the American public.  Nunes already pulled the same biased stunt in 2017, but he is back to vindicate the President.

Typically, there are several sources reviewed and vetted by intelligence agencies before making any conclusions, Congress is the presented with the information, and the courts are included to open the investigation…none of which happened with this memo.  It is a break of protocols on so many levels.

Problem:

The Republicans released “their” memo but would not release the Democratic version of accounts.

The people involved in leading the investigation of Russian probe are Republicans.

The Republicans are presenting to the American people a report that the FBI is saying is false.

The Republicans are willing to question the motives of the investigators, but they cannot find any proof that the investigation is inaccurate.

Republicans are willing to out the identities of agents and other security related people to get out their point.  And Paul Ryan has been complicit in all of this.

Agencies are not going to trust Congressional leaders anymore.

People around the world working with intelligence agencies are not going to trust us anymore, because they see that nothing is going to be protected.

There is smoke coming from the Russian probe: the Attorney General has been caught lying under oath twice, when he said he did not meet with any Russian emissaries; this fact alone should be enough to remove him from office—either he doesn’t have the memory to manage this agency, or he doesn’t pass the ethical requirements needed to be the top cop in America.  Four aides to President Trump face criminal charges in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.

This is probably going to inflame the FBI to work even harder to obtain a verifiable truth; the President has repeatedly questioned the integrity of the intelligence departments, and now has called them out for being less than competent.  It doesn’t help at any level, and it is likely to result in a war against the bureaucracy…..Trump better be lucky there is no J. Edgar Hoover’s in the FBI in 2018…..