Your best friend’s kid is a bully. Your best friend’s kid is threatening several kids in school, taunting them, frightening them, hazing them, shaking them down for their lunch money, and influencing other kids to beat your kids up when the kids stand up for themselves. You know your friend spoils this kid, and it is obvious to everyone in your circle that nothing good is going to come from this. But it is your friend’s child, and you leave it alone—you chalk it up to different parenting styles. But as this kid gets older, the kid becomes more emboldened and the abusive nature grows. It causes tensions between you and your friend, and you don’t want your kids around this kid, because the kid is a bad seed, and the maturation of this seed is being directly nourished by someone you valued and thought they would do better. Your friend is raising this kid on poisoned water, indirect sunlight, and tainted earth. Bad value system about others who are different, poor reasoning in moral arguments, unhealthy ways to manage disagreement and conflict and what the kid desires. The kid makes Veruca Salt look like a model child.
So, another friend in your circle has a child in the class with the bully and is a victim of your friend’s kid. For the longest time, you have tried to stay out of the mess; but now one family is not getting invited to the parties or playdates of the other anymore, and each of your friends are in your ear bad mouthing the other side. Both sides want your allegiance, and not only are you made to choose sides in the argument, but you are now forced to choose between friendships.
You cannot choose the side of the bully; in fact, you realize that you have contempt for this little kid, and it is affecting how you feel about your friend. As you distance yourself and your kids from this friend, you now see that the friend is also a bully, and now this friend is forcing a way back in your presence, having a I-won’t-be-ignored-by-you attitude in the conflict. The bully parent is now attempting to bully you to accept their friendship, yet you are having none of it.
As things heat up at school, many parents are forcing the administration to intervene. Kids need to feel safe, to be safe at school, and the parents are fed up with the lack of results thus far. The school’s administration engages in a variety of “safe space” meetings, which enable everyone to be heard. But the amount and the scope of the arguments from the victims is deafening, and it is clear to you that this is a one-sided abusive relationship. But the bully and the bully parent, your friend, will not back down. They now see this as personal attacks on them, and they are at war with everyone. The bully parent writes a note to the school district law enforcement/administration, stating that it is their side which feels threatened. The bully parent says that because the kids on the other side are black and brown, and they are white, their child is being targeted for being different, and they believe that the system is out to disadvantage white kids in favor of minorities. The parent brings in tangential arguments about affirmative action to illustrate their points. The bully parent then makes assertions that the other kids are colluding together because they in fact hate white people, and all accusations against the bully kid are fake. The bully parent tells the administration that their family is going to go to the media and report the reverse racism in the school district. In the complaint, the bully parent makes no argument in favor of disciplining any speficic children or taking any particular course of action; they just want to let other white people know of the reverse discrimination on campus.
But the problem is, nearly all the kids who have been victimized by the bully kid, are white. You, are white; your friend’s kid in the class with the bully, is white. The school is overwhelmingly white. No black kids are even involved. The school law enforcement asks the bully parent to not go public with this letter, because it would set a bad precedent and inflame the community, particularly when the investigation by the enforcement group isn’t over, and it is pointing to a conclusion that the bully kid is indeed the perpetrator of the offenses.
The bully parent calls the news outlets, releases the letter on social media, and hires an attorney…..
When the FBI questions the accuracy of the Nunes memo and has grave concerns about omissions and points grouped together, that means in plain speak that the FBI believes this memo is a bunch of lies.
The Democrats are mad because:
The Democrats believe this entire process is complete crap.
In years past, when they could not reach a bipartisan perspective, both sides were allowed to put out their versions of the conflict; not anymore. The Republicans voted down on many occasions the opportunity for Democrats to release the Adam Schiff memo. Even if the Republicans voted for them to release their version, the President could still say no.
The Republicans are trying to sway public opinion to believe that the system is out to get them.
The Republicans are trying to discredit the FBI investigation.
The Republicans are trying to intimidate the FBI, by letting them know that they are prepared to report them if they don’t like what they see, particularly if it places the President in a bad light.
The Republicans are trying to blow up any government agency that does not fall in line with the President.
This reads like a staff written memo, crafted in a way to make suggestions and strange conclusions without a lot of fact (i.e. the Steele dossier was written to benefit Hillary Clinton, rather than the fact that the document was written for Republicans and ultimately reviewed by the Clinton campaign)
This is a document that is likely written by people in the White House and given to Nunes to present to the American public. Nunes already pulled the same biased stunt in 2017, but he is back to vindicate the President.
Typically, there are several sources reviewed and vetted by intelligence agencies before making any conclusions, Congress is the presented with the information, and the courts are included to open the investigation…none of which happened with this memo. It is a break of protocols on so many levels.
Problem:
The Republicans released “their” memo but would not release the Democratic version of accounts.
The people involved in leading the investigation of Russian probe are Republicans.
The Republicans are presenting to the American people a report that the FBI is saying is false.
The Republicans are willing to question the motives of the investigators, but they cannot find any proof that the investigation is inaccurate.
Republicans are willing to out the identities of agents and other security related people to get out their point. And Paul Ryan has been complicit in all of this.
Agencies are not going to trust Congressional leaders anymore.
People around the world working with intelligence agencies are not going to trust us anymore, because they see that nothing is going to be protected.
There is smoke coming from the Russian probe: the Attorney General has been caught lying under oath twice, when he said he did not meet with any Russian emissaries; this fact alone should be enough to remove him from office—either he doesn’t have the memory to manage this agency, or he doesn’t pass the ethical requirements needed to be the top cop in America. Four aides to President Trump face criminal charges in special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election.
This is probably going to inflame the FBI to work even harder to obtain a verifiable truth; the President has repeatedly questioned the integrity of the intelligence departments, and now has called them out for being less than competent. It doesn’t help at any level, and it is likely to result in a war against the bureaucracy…..Trump better be lucky there is no J. Edgar Hoover’s in the FBI in 2018…..